- Journal List
- Springer
- PMC11450089
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
Ir J Med Sci. 2024; 193(5): 2469–2484.
Published online 2024 Jun 25. doi:10.1007/s11845-024-03735-0
PMCID: PMC11450089
PMID: 38918276
Sevda Uzun
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
Associated Data
- Data Availability Statement
Abstract
Objective
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of nurses’ psychosocial interventions for addressing sensory deprivation in intensive care units (ICUs).
Materials and methods
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, CİNAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and YÖK Thesis Center databases was conducted from August 2023 to May 2024, without any temporal restrictions. In addition, a physical search was made in the university library for grey literature.
Results
The study revealed that nurses’ psychosocial interventions significantly improved patients’ level of consciousness (SMD = 1.042, %95 CI = 0.716 to 1.369; Z = 6.25; p < .05) and sleep quality in ICUs (SMD=1.21, 95% CI= 0.232 to 1.810; Z = 2.49; p < .05). The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions varied based on the type of intervention, patient age, ICU type, patient group, and intervention duration. Notably, auditory stimuli and aromatherapy demonstrated particularly high effect sizes, significantly enhancing patients’ levels of consciousness and sleep quality.
Conclusion
In conclusion, psychosocial interventions aimed at reducing sensory deprivation in intensive care units exert beneficial effects on individuals, notably enhancing their level of consciousness and improving sleep quality.
Keywords: Critical care, Nurse, Sensory deprivation, Systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction
Intensive care units (ICUs) are specialized departments dedicated to the treatment of severely ill patients who require close monitoring and specific medical interventions to support vital functions. These units are equipped with advanced medical devices and demand a high level of attention. Patients with significantly compromised life functions find essential care in the ICU, where specialized treatment is administered. The ICU stands out from other hospital departments not only due to its technical sophistication but also its distinctive physical environment and unique treatment methodologies. The presence of a large number of personnel in the intensive care unit and the constant hum of medical devices may cause sensory overload in individuals [8, 48].
Consequently, patients in the ICU often contend with sensory deprivation, encountering challenges related to sensory input. To address these sensory issues in patients, it becomes crucial to implement psychosocial interventions alongside medical treatments. Psychological needs among nursing interventions for psychosocial needs identification and elimination, therapeutic relationship, interviewing, listening, empathy, giving information, and coping with stress practices such as training are included [3, 4]. Beyond the primary focus on medical care, these psychosocial approaches aim to enhance patient well-being and improve their overall quality of life. The implementation of such approaches holds the potential to mitigate physiological stress in patients, reducing the risk of complications associated with intensive care. These physiological values include physical parameters such as blood pressure, pulse, and pain [8, 9, 31, 42, 45, 48].
In the literature, it is highlighted that limitations in movement and body posture, coupled with social isolation, contribute to sensory deprivation in intensive care patients. This situation is associated with the development of ICU syndrome, characterized by symptoms such as diminished cognitive functions, restlessness, aggression, disruptions in the sleep–wake cycle, and disorientation [6, 45].
Nurses play a crucial role in addressing the sensory input problems of intensive care patients by incorporating psychosocial approaches into their care practices. These approaches, employed alongside medical treatments, aim to enhance patient care and improve the overall quality of life. Psychosocial interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing physiological indicators like pulse, blood pressure, and respiration by activating sensory perceptions and inducing a relaxation effect and have contributed to the control and prevention of complications related to intensive care, such as sleep disturbances, pain, and anxiety [23, 44].
Expressive touch, music therapy, and aromatherapy are among the complementary treatment methods applied by nurses that can be applied for sensory input problems of intensive care patients and can positively affect sensory perceptions. Expressive touch, one of the planned sensory input applications, is touch with emotional content. With the touch movement applied to the skin, the receptors are stimulated and the messages to the brain are interpreted and responded to by the person. Touch makes the patient feel valued, increases patient-nurse communication, reduces the patient’s psycho-social problems, and affects physiological recovery by regulating respiration, blood pressure, and pulse [13, 23, 45].
Music therapy, which is also among the methods applied by nurses, lowers blood pressure, regulates the number of respirations, causes a decrease in pulse rate, and is used in patient care as a complementary method. Aromatherapy, which is one of the planned sensory input applications, is a complementary treatment method made with herbal essential oils. There are many oil extracts such as lemon balm, eucalyptus, and lavender used for aromatherapy. It is stated that these oils are effective in reducing pain, stress, and anxiety; improving stress coping mechanisms; and increasing the sense of psychological well-being [13, 14, 42].
A systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on the impact of family-centered sensory and emotional stimulation in comatose patients with traumatic brain injury revealed its effectiveness in improving the level of consciousness and cognition [49]. Another meta-analysis conducted by Liang et al. [26] found that nonpharmacological methods performed by nurses were effective in preventing delirium in individuals [26]. Li et al. [25] discovered in their meta-analysis that music therapy had a positive impact on the consciousness of individuals in intensive care units. This study aims to uncover the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions applied by nurses for addressing sensory deprivation in intensive care units.
Materials and methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis study adhered to the PRISMA checklist (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) guidelines [29] to ensure transparency and rigor. To minimize bias, the researchers (article author and non-author researcher) conducted the literature search, article selection, and data extraction with a dual scanning approach, which was then cross-verified by the researchers. The researchers (article author and non-author researcher) also personally performed the quality assessment of the studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
In this study, studies were screened according to PICOS:
Study group (P: Patient): İntensive and critical care patients
Intervention (I: Intervention): Psychosocial interventions
Comparison (C: Comparison): No psychosocial interventions
Outcomes (C: Outcomes): Sensory deprivation (level of consciousness, sleep disruption)
Study design (S: Study design): Experimental, quasi-experimental studies published in Turkish and English
The exclusion criteria are as follows:
Letters to the editor and systematic and traditional review studies were excluded from the scope of this study.
Search strategy
Between August 2023 and May 2024, a comprehensive search was executed across PubMed (including MEDLINE), EBSCO host Web of Science, Yök Thesis, CİNAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar using the MeSH-compatible keywords, such as (“critical care”[MeSH Terms] OR (“critical”[All Fields] AND “care”[All Fields]) OR “critical care”[All Fields]) AND (“nurses”[MeSH Terms] OR “nurses”[All Fields] OR “nurse”[All Fields]) AND (“psychosocial intervention”[MeSH Terms] OR (“psychosocial”[All Fields] AND “intervention”[All Fields]) OR “psychosocial intervention”[All Fields]). No temporal restrictions were imposed due to the limited number of studies on sensory deprivation, resulting in a scan of all available years.
Selection of studies
In the initial search, 38,003 records were identified. Following the removal of duplicate studies, 8123 records were analyzed based on their title and abstracts. After this initial review, 130 studies were chosen for a thorough examination in full text. Subsequently, these 130 full-text articles were assessed against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, leading to the inclusion of 22 studies that reported outcomes related to the impact of psychosocial interventions. Figure1 provides a visual representation of the article selection process.
Fig.1
Selection of studies according to the PRISMA flow diagram
Potential articles were first screened by title and abstract. EndNote X8® (2019 Clarivate) was used to remove duplicates and organize the reference list.
Data extraction
For data extraction, a tool developed by the researcher was employed to collect relevant information from the selected studies included in the systematic review meta-analysis. This tool facilitated the extraction of data on key aspects, such as author and publication year, study design, and the type of psychosocial intervention (Table (Table11).
Table 1
Characteristics and results of the included studies
| Author/year | Patient group/intensive care unit | Study design | Origin of study | Sample size characteristics | Measurement tools | Psychosocial intervention applied | Duration of intervention | Main outcomes | Quality score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salmani et al., 2017 [37] | Patients with brain injury/neurology intensive care | Randomized controlled | Iran | Experimental group: 30 Control group: 30 | Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) | Family-centered emotional stimulation | 2 weeks | Individuals in the experimental group received family-centered sensory stimulation. Individuals in the control group received routine emotional stimulation. Improvements in the level of consciousness were found to be more effective for those in the experimental group | Yes: 8/13 No: 3/13 Uncertain: 1/13 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Lee and Kang, 2020 [24] | Patients with cardiologic diseases/cardiology intensive care unit | Randomized controlled | South Korea | Experimental group: 24 Control group: 24 | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index | Meditation through virtual reality | 3 weeks | Individuals in the experimental group were meditated through virtual reality, and their sleep quality was found to be higher than the control group | Yes: 13/13 |
| Naseri-Salahshou et al., 2018 [30] | Patients in the internal medicine intensive care unit | Randomized controlled | Iran | Experimental group: 33 Control group: 33 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Listening to the Quran | 1 week | Individuals in the experimental group were read suras from the Quran, and the level of consciousness of the individuals in the experimental group was found to be better | Yes: 13/13 |
| Şirin Gök, 2015 [41] | Anesthesia intensive care | Quasi-experimental | Türkiye | 43 patients | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Listening to the voices of relatives | 3 weeks | Individuals were made to listen to music, nature sounds, and the voices of their relatives, and it was found that the voices of their relatives positively affected the level of consciousness | Yes: 5/9 No: 3/9 Uncertain: 1/9 |
| Öz and Cerit, 2023 [32] | Coronary intensive care unit | Randomized controlled | Türkiye | Experimental group: 23 Control group: 23 | Richard–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire | Earplugs and eye patches | 2 weeks | In the Coronary Intensive Care Unit, it was determined that eye patch and ear plugs had a positive effect on sleep quality in inpatients | Yes: 13/13 |
| Karaman Özlü and Bilican, 2017 [33] | Surgical intensive care | Randomized controlled | Türkiye | Experimental group: 30 Control group: 30 | The Richards-Campbell Sleep Scale | Aromatherapy massage | 1 week | Individuals in the experimental group were massaged with aromatherapy, and significant improvements in sleep quality were observed | Yes: 13/13 |
| Bahanor et al., 2019 [5] | Patients with traumatic brain injury/neurology intensive care | Randomized controlled | İran | Experimental group: 30 Control group: 30 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Listening to nature sounds | 2 weeks | Individuals in the experimental group were made to listen to nature sounds, and significant improvements were observed in the level of consciousness of the patients in the experimental group | Yes: 13/13 |
| Sargolzaei et al., 2017 [39] | Intensive care patients with cerebrovascular disease | Randomized controlled | Iran | Experimental group: 40 Control group: 40 | Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART) | Sensory stimulation program | 2 weeks | Sensory stimulation program was applied to the patients in the intervention group, and significant improvements were achieved in the sensory functions of the patients | Yes: 9/13 No: 2/13 Uncertain: 1/13 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Megha et al., 2013 [27] | Patients with traumatic brain injury/neurology intensive care | Randomized controlled | India | Experimental group: 10 Control group: 10 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Multimodal coma stimulation | 2 weeks | Multimodal coma stimulation was applied to the patients in the intervention group, and significant improvements were achieved in the level of consciousness of the patients | Yes: 8/13 No: 3/13 Uncertain: 1/13 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Çevik and Namık, 2018 [10] | Coma patients | Randomized controlled | Türkiye | Experimental group: 30 Control group: 30 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Auditory stimuli | 1 week | Auditory stimuli were applied to the patients in the intervention group, and significant improvements were achieved in the level of consciousness of the patients | Yes: 13/13 |
| Urbenjaphol et al., 2009 [46] | Patients with traumatic brain injury/neurology intensive care | Randomized controlled | Thailand | Experimental group: 20 Control group: 20 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Sensory stimulation program | 2 weeks | A sensory stimulation program was applied to the patients in the intervention group, and significant improvements were achieved in the level of consciousness of the patients | Yes: 9/13 No: 2/13 Belirsiz: 1/13 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Henricson et al., 2008 [19] | General intensive care | Randomized controlled | Canada | Experimental group: 23 Control group: 23 | APACHE, The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation | Therapeutic touch | 10 weeks | Relaxation was observed in individuals in the experimental group in which therapeutic touch was performed | Yes: 13/13 |
| Uysal and Vaizoğlu, 2023 [47] | General intensive care | Quasi-experimental | Türkiye | 135 patients | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Interviewing family members through virtual reality | 1 week | Video interviewing positively affected the coma scale scores of the patients | Yes: 5/9 No: 3/9 Uncertain: 1/9 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Moeini et al., 2010 [28] | Coronary intensive care | Randomized controlled | Iran | Experimental group: 32 Control group: 32 | St. Mary’s Hospital Sleep Questionnaire (SMHSQ) | Aromatherapy | 1 week | It was found that the sleep quality of the aromatherapy group was higher | Yes: 13/13 |
| Rooin et al., 2023 [35] | Patients with traumatic brain injury/neurology intensive care | Randomized controlled | Iran | Experimental group: 45 Control group: 45 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Reflexology-based foot massage | 1 week | Individuals in the experimental group underwent reflexology and the level of consciousness of this group was found to be better | Yes: 13/13 |
| Akpinar et al., [2] | General intensive care | Randomized controlled | Türkiye | Experimental group: 42 Control group: 42 | Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) | Earplugs and eye patches | 1 week | It was determined that eye patch and earplug application had a positive effect on sleep quality in patients hospitalized in the General Intensive Care Unit | Yes: 13/13 |
| Şanlıtürk et al., 2023 [38] | COVID-19 intensive care | Randomized controlled | Türkiye | Experimental group: 43 Control group: 49 | APACHE, The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation | Cognitive Stimuli and Sleep Hygiene | 4 weeks | Sensory stimulation and sleep hygiene interventions used in delirium prevention are effective in reducing the incidence of delirium in COVID-19 patients in intensive care | Yes: 9/13 No: 2/13 Uncertain: 1/13 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Parveen et al., [34] | Patients with traumatic brain injury/neurology intensive care | Randomized controlled | India | Experimental group: 40 Control group: 40 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Auditory stimulation | 2 weeks | Auditory stimulation by family members was found to be effective on the level of consciousness | Yes: 9/13 No: 2/13 Uncertain: 1/13 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Gorji et al., [16] | Patients with traumatic brain injury/neurology intensive care | Randomized controlled | Iran | Experimental group: 15 Control group: 15 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Listening to the voices of relatives | 2 weeks | Individuals in the experimental group were made to listen to the voices of their relatives and it was found that the level of consciousness of the individuals in the experimental group was better | Yes: 9/13 No: 2/13 Uncertain: 1/13 Not applicable:1/13 |
| Karaman Özlü and Özer, 2017 [21] | Cardiovascular intensive care | Randomized controlled | Türkiye | Experimental group: 50 Control group: 50 | Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) | Regulation of environmental factors | 1 week | Environmental stimuli were reduced for the individuals in the experimental group and a significant increase in sleep quality was observed | Yes: 8/13 No: 3/13 Uncertain: 1/13 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Khojeh et al., 2018 [22] | General intensive care | Randomized controlled | İran | Experimental group: 20 Control group: 20 | The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) | Listening to the voices of relatives | 1 week | Individuals in the experimental group were made to listen to the voices of their relatives and it was found that the level of consciousness of the individuals in the experimental group was better | Yes: 9/13 No: 2/13 Uncertain: 1/13 Not applicable: 1/13 |
| Chuaykarn et al., 2017 [11] | Patients with traumatic brain injury/neurology intensive care | Randomized controlled | Thailand | Experimental group: 15 Control group: 15 | Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) | Sensory stimulation program | 2 weeks | Sensory stimulation program was applied to the patients in the intervention group and significant improvements were observed in the level of consciousness of the patients | Yes: 13/13 |
Open in a separate window
Research ethics
This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis and is based on published studies.
Assessment of the methodological quality of studies
The quality assessment of the studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using quality assessment tools prepared based on the study design by The Joanna Briggs Institute (The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for Use in IBI Systematic Reviews, 2021). The tool contains information on sample representativeness of the target population, participant recruitment, adequacy of the sample size, detailed description of the study subjects and study setting, sufficient coverage of the data analysis, objective criteria in the measurement of the outcome variable, and identification of subpopulation, reliability, appropriate statistical analysis, and identification of confounding variables. The quality scores of the included studies were assessed and presented using the mean scores to designate them as high or low quality. The JBI tool for prevalence studies was used as a guideline for data extraction from the selected articles.
The selection of evaluation tools in this study was tailored to the specific designs of the included studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis. For randomized controlled trials, a set of 13 questions was employed (The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for Use in IBI Systematic Reviews, 2021), while quasi-experimental studies were evaluated using 9 questions [43]. Responses to these questions were “Yes, No, Uncertain, Not Applicable.” The methodological quality of the studies was categorized as “mediocre” if fewer than 50% of items were rated as “yes,” “moderate” if 51–80% of items were rated as “yes,” and “good” if more than 80% of items were rated as “yes.”
The data extraction tool included crucial information such as the author and year of the study, title, year of study, year of publication, study area and country, sub-region, study design and type, study population, age of participants, sample size, response rate, and the measured outcome. The evaluation results for each study are presented in Table1 as “Quality Score.”
Data synthesis
This study utilized CMA Ver. 2 for conducting statistical calculations. The assessment of heterogeneity among the studies involved the application of Cochrane Q and Higgins I2 tests. A Higgins I2 value exceeding 50% was considered indicative of significant heterogeneity. SMD (standardized mean difference) was calculated at a 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome variable in the study. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05 for all tests.
Moderator analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plots, Egger test, and Begg and Mazumdar Rank Correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate publication bias.
Results
Twenty of the studies included in the study were randomized-controlled experimental studies and two were quasi-experimental with a pre-post-test and a control group. The total sample size of the studies was 1294 (intervention group = 555; control group = 561; single group = 178) (Table1).
The systematic review and meta-analysis included studies that collectively demonstrated that over 50% of the criteria in the assessment tool were met (Table1); this indicates a moderate quality of evidence. This underscores the reliability of the analysis findings, which draw from studies with commendable evidence quality.
Meta-analysis results on the effectiveness of nurses’ psychosocial interventions for sensory deprivation in intensive care units on the level of consciousness of individuals
Due to the considerable heterogeneity among the studies, a random effects model was employed (I2 = 83.64%; Q = 91,711; p > 0.05). The systematic review and meta-analysis results revealed the effectiveness of nurses’ psychosocial interventions for sensory deprivation in intensive care units, demonstrating significant enhancements, particularly in patients’ level of consciousness (SMD = 1.042, %95 CI = 0.716 to 1.369; Z = 6.25; p < 0.05). Sensitivity analysis, conducted using Egger and Begg tests, indicated no evidence of publication bias (Egger test: t = 0.69, p = 0.49; Begg test: z = 1.30, p = 0.19). Additionally, the absence of publication bias was confirmed through an examination of the funnel plot (see Fig. Fig.22).
Fig. 2
Funnel plot of the level of consciousness
The effect sizes, standardized as Cohen’s d or Hedges’s g, were utilized to measure the effect size [17]. In this investigation, Cohen’s d was employed, with statistical significance set at 95%. Regarding the effect sizes, Cohen’s [12] criteria were referenced, where values falling between 0.75 and 1.10 indicate a large effect. An average effect size of ES = 1.042 was calculated (Table (Table2).2). Based on these calculations, data from 16 studies included in the systematic review meta-analysis suggest that psychosocial interventions by nurses for the level of consciousness in intensive care units yield a significant impact on individuals according to the random effects model [12]. The forest plot of these 16 studies is provided below in Fig. Fig.33.
Table 2
Moderator results for the effect of nurses’ psychosocial interventions for sensory deprivation in intensive care units
| Moderator | Number of studies | Effect size | Standard error | Lower limit | Upper limit | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of intensive care unit | ||||||
| Neurology intensive care | 9 | 1.072 | 0.191 | 0.698 | 1.447 | 0.000 |
| General intensive care | 6 | 1.025 | 0.342 | 0.354 | 1.696 | 0.003 |
| Cardiology intensive care | 3 | 0.517 | 0.444 | − 0.354 | 1.388 | 0.245 |
| Anesthesia intensive care | 1 | 0.131 | 0.216 | − 0.293 | 0.554 | 0.546 |
| Surgical intensive care | 1 | 2.133 | 0.323 | 1.500 | 2.676 | 0.000 |
| COVID-19 intensive care | 1 | 1.042 | 1.223 | 0.606 | 1.479 | 0.000 |
| Cardiovascular surgery intensive care | 1 | 2.130 | 0.250 | 1.639 | 2.621 | 0.000 |
| Total | 22 | 0.961 | 0.055 | 0.852 | 1.069 | 0.000 |
| Type of psychosocial intervention implemented | ||||||
| Listening to the voices of relatives | 4 | 0.713 | 0.403 | − 0.077 | 0.502 | 0.077 |
| Sensory stimulation program | 3 | 1.340 | 0.234 | 0.881 | 1.800 | 0.000 |
| Providing auditory stimuli | 2 | 1.515 | 0.709 | 0.128 | 2.902 | 0.032 |
| Earplugs and eye patches | 2 | 0.848 | 0.566 | − 0.262 | 1.958 | 0.134 |
| Multimodal coma stimulation | 1 | 1.310 | 0.285 | 0.752 | 1.867 | 0.000 |
| Aromatherapy | 1 | 0.352 | 0.252 | − 0.142 | 0.846 | 0.162 |
| Reflexology-based foot massage | 1 | 1.070 | 0.225 | 0.629 | 1.513 | 0.000 |
| Cognitive stimulus and sleep hygiene training | 1 | 1.042 | 0.233 | 1.606 | 1.479 | 0.000 |
| Regulation of environmental factors | 1 | 2.130 | 0.250 | 1.639 | 2.621 | 0.000 |
| Interviewing family members through virtual reality | 1 | − 0.199 | 0.084 | − 0.766 | 0.368 | 0.492 |
| Aromatherapy massage | 1 | 2.133 | 0.323 | 1.500 | 2.676 | 0.000 |
| Listening to nature sounds | 1 | 0.079 | 0.258 | − 0.428 | 0.585 | 0.761 |
| Listening to the Quran | 1 | 2.302 | 0.317 | 1.679 | 2.924 | 0.000 |
| Meditation through virtual reality | 1 | 1.082 | 0.130 | 0.826 | 1.337 | 0.000 |
| Therapeutic touch | 1 | − 0.031 | 0.295 | − 0.609 | 0.547 | 0.916 |
| Total | 22 | 1.032 | 0.066 | 0.903 | 1.162 | 0.000 |
| Duration of psychosocial intervention | ||||||
| 1 week | 8 | 1.211 | 0.266 | − 0.689 | 1.732 | 0.000 |
| 2 weeks | 8 | 1.081 | 0.226 | 0.637 | 1.525 | 0.000 |
| 3 days | 2 | 0.013 | 0.173 | − 0.992 | − 0.001 | 0.914 |
| 1 day | 1 | 2.133 | 0.323 | − 0.326 | 0.352 | 0.000 |
| 10 weeks | 1 | − 0.031 | 0.295 | − 0.609 | 0.547 | 0.946 |
| 2 days | 1 | 1.442 | 0.331 | 0.793 | 2.090 | 0.000 |
| 4 weeks | 1 | 1.042 | 0.223 | 0.606 | 1.479 | 0.000 |
| Total | 22 | 0.791 | 0.092 | 0.610 | 0.972 | 0.000 |
| Patient group | ||||||
| Patients with traumatic brain injury | 8 | 1.016 | 0.197 | 0.630 | 1.402 | 0.000 |
| Patients with internal diseases | 6 | 1.025 | 0.342 | 0.354 | 1.696 | 0.003 |
| Patients with cardiological diseases | 4 | 0.931 | 0.543 | − 0.132 | − 1.995 | 0.086 |
| Patients who have undergone surgical operations | 1 | 2.133 | 0.323 | − 1.500 | 2.676 | 0.000 |
| Patients with COVID-19 disease | 1 | 1.042 | 0.223 | 0.606 | 1.479 | 0.000 |
| Patients with neurological and metabolic diseases | 1 | 0.131 | 0.216 | − 0.293 | 0.554 | 0.546 |
| Patients with cerebrovascular disease | 1 | 1.791 | 0.529 | 0.754 | 2.829 | 0.001 |
| Total | 22 | 0.959 | 0.104 | 0.756 | 1.163 | 0.000 |
| Age range of the sample group | ||||||
| 18–65 years old | 15 | 0.935 | 0.201 | 0.541 | 1.330 | 0.000 |
| 15–65 years old | 1 | 0.826 | 0.233 | 0.370 | 1.283 | 0.303 |
| 18–50 years old | 1 | 0.328 | 0.318 | − 0.296 | 1.031 | 0.303 |
| 18–60 years old | 1 | 1.535 | 0.415 | 0.721 | 2.349 | 0.000 |
| 20–60 years old | 1 | 2.302 | 0.317 | 1.679 | 2.924 | 0.000 |
| 25–55 years old | 1 | 1.310 | 0.285 | 0.752 | 1.867 | 0.000 |
| 35–75 years old | 1 | 1.791 | 0.529 | 0.754 | 2.829 | 0.001 |
| 45–65 years old | 1 | 1.042 | 0.233 | 0.606 | 1.479 | 0.000 |
| Total | 22 | 1.115 | 0.980 | 0.924 | 1.307 | 0.000 |
Open in a separate window
Fig. 3
Forest plot of the level of consciousness
Meta-analysis results on the effect of nurses’ psychosocial interventions for sensory deprivation on sleep quality in intensive care units
Since these studies had a high level of heterogeneity, random effects model was used (I2 = 92.61%; Q = 67.72, p > 0.05). The result of the meta-analysis shows that psychosocial interventions by nurses for sensory deprivation in intensive care units are effective on patients and provide significant improvements in sleep quality (SMD=1.21, 95% CI= 0.232 to 1.810; Z = 2.49; p < 0.05). Egger and Begg tests were used for sensitivity analysis (Egger test: t = 0.78, p = 0.47) and no publication bias was found (Begg test: z = 0.00, p = 1.00). In addition, no publication bias was found in the funnel plot (Fig.4).
Fig.4
Funnel plot of sleep quality variable
While interpreting the effect sizes, the effect size classification determined by Cohen [12] was taken into consideration and the value between 0.75 and 1.10 indicates a large effect. The average effect size value ES = 1.21 was calculated (Table (Table2).2). The data in the 6 studies included in the meta-analysis in line with the calculations show that psychosocial interventions by nurses for sensory deprivation in intensive care units have a large effect on the sleep quality of individuals according to the random effects model [12]. The forest plot of the 6 studies within the scope of the research is given in Fig. Fig.55.
Fig. 5
Forest plot of sleep quality variable
Moderator results for the effect of nurses’ psychosocial interventions for sensory deprivation in intensive care units
Moderator analyses were conducted for the effect of psychosocial interventions made by nurses for sensory deprivation in intensive care units. Moderator evaluations include subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Moderator analyses performed in systematic reviews and meta-analyses are used to test which factors (moderators) can explain the differences in the observed effect size [18].
In the study, moderator analyses were performed for the type of intensive care unit in which the patient stayed, the type of psychosocial intervention applied, the duration of the psychotherapeutic intervention applied, and the age range of the sample group.
The average effect size for the specific type of intensive care unit where patients were hospitalized was determined to be 0.961 with a significance level of p < 0.05. This study revealed that the type of intensive care unit had an impact on the size of the effect. Additionally, the average effect size for the type of psychosocial intervention utilized in the systematic review meta-analysis was calculated at 1.032 with a significance level of p < 0.05.
It was observed that the type of psychosocial intervention influenced the size of the effect of psychotherapeutic interventions administered to individuals. Through moderator analysis, it was established that the duration of psychotherapeutic intervention (SMD = 0.791 and p < 0.05), patient group (SMD = 0.959 and p < 0.05) and age range of the sample group (SMD = 1.115 and p < 0.05) all played significant roles in determining the effect size of psychosocial interventions (Table2).
Discussion
This study concludes that nurses’ psychosocial interventions for sensory deprivation in intensive care units effectively improved patients’ levels of consciousness and sleep quality. In line with our findings, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Hwang and Shin [20] revealed that nurses’ use of aromatherapy in intensive care units prevented sleep disruption and notably enhanced sleep quality [20]. Similarly, Li et al. [25] conducted a meta-analysis demonstrating that music therapy positively impacted individuals’ consciousness states in intensive care units [25]. Another systematic review conducted by Sahawneh and Boss [36] revealed that nonpharmacological methods implemented by nurses effectively reduced both the occurrence and duration of delirium [36]. These findings underscore the pivotal role of psychosocial methods employed by nurses in addressing sensory deprivation among individuals in intensive care settings.
Furthermore, the study identified a significant correlation between the type of psychosocial intervention utilized and the effectiveness of interventions on individuals. Likewise, a systematic review led by Bellon et al. [7] indicated that interventions such as earplugs, eye masks, music, and acupuncture were effective and led to notable enhancements in individuals’ sleep quality [7]. Similarly, Abbas et al. [1] reported in their systematic review that earplugs and aromatherapy massage played crucial roles in reducing sleep disruption. Earplugs and aromatherapy massage were also reported to alleviate anxiety and enhance sleep quality among individuals [40]. In our study, various interventions, including sensory stimulation programs, auditory stimulation, multimodal coma stimulation, reflexology-based foot massage, cognitive stimulation, sleep hygiene training, regulation of environmental factors, and aromatherapy, were found to significantly improve individuals’ level of consciousness and sleep quality. These findings reinforce the multifaceted approaches available to nurses for addressing sensory deprivation and enhancing the well-being of patients in intensive care units.
The study identified that the type of intensive care unit where patients were hospitalized significantly influenced the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions. In our investigation, psychosocial interventions administered to patients across various intensive care units, including neurology, general, surgical, COVID-19, and cardiovascular surgery intensive care, were found to yield positive outcomes. Notably, a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on family-centered sensory and emotional stimulation in neurology intensive care patients with traumatic brain injury highlighted its effectiveness in enhancing patients’ level of consciousness and cognition [49]. This suggests that regardless of the specific intensive care unit, the intensive care environment can detrimentally impact individuals, emphasizing the importance of psychosocial interventions.
Moreover, our study revealed that the age range of the sample group played a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in intensive care units. Specifically, interventions applied to individuals aged 18 and older were found to effectively alleviate sensory deprivation. A meta-analysis conducted by Erwin et al. [15] underscored the presence of risk factors for delirium and sensory deprivation in pediatric intensive care units. Notably, the use of physical restraint and mechanical ventilation in children was identified as particularly detrimental [15]. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring psychosocial interventions to the unique needs and vulnerabilities of patients across different age groups in intensive care settings.
The duration of psychosocial interventions emerged as a significant factor influencing their effectiveness in our study. Specifically, interventions lasting 1, 2, and 4 weeks, as well as those administered over 1 or 2 days, were found to be effective for individuals in intensive care units. Conversely, contrasting results were observed in a study focusing on neurology intensive care patients with traumatic brain injury, where the duration of intervention did not impact the effect size [49]. Discrepancies between our findings and those in the literature may stem from differences in intervention procedures and inclusion criteria across studies.
Conclusion and recommendations
This study highlights the effectiveness of nurses’ psychosocial interventions for alleviating sensory deprivation in intensive care units, leading to significant enhancements in patients’ levels of consciousness and sleep quality. Various factors, including the type of psychosocial intervention, the age range of the sample, the type of intensive care unit, the patient group, and the duration of the intervention, were identified as influential in the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions. Specifically, interventions such as sensory stimulation programs, auditory stimulation, multimodal coma stimulation, reflexology-based foot massage, cognitive stimulation, sleep hygiene training, regulation of environmental factors, and aromatherapy significantly improved individuals’ level of consciousness. It is thought that the transformation and application of intensive care nurses’ knowledge about psychosocial care into skills in providing holistic care to patients receiving treatment in intensive care will contribute to increasing the quality of nursing care. In this context, it is recommended that nursing interventions with proven effectiveness through evidence-based research on sensory deprivation problems in intensive care patients should be used in patient care and nurses should be supported in this regard.
Relevance for clinical practice
Based on the findings of this study, psychosocial interventions by nurses to prevent and reduce sensory deprivation can be used to positively affect the level of consciousness and sleep quality of individuals in intensive care.
Limitation of studies
The presence of small sample sizes, lack of blinding, and utilization of pre- and post-test designs in some of the studies included in the analysis may be viewed as limitations of this study, which could potentially diminish the robustness of the evidence supporting the study’s findings.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank my friend S.T. for his help in scanning, extracting, and quality assessment of the data.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Footnotes
Key points
This study emphasizes that psychosocial interventions performed by nurses to prevent and reduce sensory deprivation in individuals hospitalized in intensive care have very positive effects on individuals.
Psychosocial interventions performed by nurses for sensory deprivation in intensive care units can provide significant improvements in the level of consciousness and sleep quality.
The study reveals that nurses play a critical role in intensive care units.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Articles used in the systematic review meta-analysis are indicated with * (asterisk).
1. Abbas Q, Memon F, Laghari P et al (2020) Potentially preventable mortality in the pediatric intensive care unit: findings from a retrospective mortality analysis. Cureus 12(3):e7358 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. *Akpinar RB, Aksoy M, Kant E (2022) Effect of earplug/eye mask on sleep and delirium in intensive care patients. Nurs Crit Care 27(4):537–545 [PubMed]
3. Alkhawaldeh JFMA, Soh KL, Mukhtar FBM, Peng OC, Anshasi HA (2020) Stress management interventions for intensive and critical care nurses: a systematic review. Nurs Crit Care 25(2):84–92 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Arslan Y, Yazıcı G (2021) Psychosocial care approach of intensive care nurses and the role of consultation liaison psychiatry nursing. TJHR 2(2):29–35
5. *Bahonar E, Ghezeljeh TN, Haghani H (2019) Comparison of single and combined effects of nature sounds and foot sole reflexology massage on the level of consciousness in traumatic comatose patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Holist Nurs Pract 33(3):177–186 [PubMed]
6. Bayraktar DT, Yetimoğlu M (2019) Determination of intensive care nurses’ thoughts on music therapy. Gümüşhane Univ J Health Sci 8(3):231–236 [Google Scholar]
7. Bellon F, Beti-Abad A, Pastells-Peiró R, Casado-Ramirez E, Moreno-Casbas T, Gea-Sánchez M, Abad-Corpa E (2023) Effects of nursing interventions to improve inpatients’ sleep in intensive and non-intensive care units: findings from an umbrella review. J Clin Nurs 32(9–10):1963–1978 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Biricik E, Güneş Y (2022) Covid 19 pandemic and delirium. J Arch Resour Screen 31(3):137–150 [Google Scholar]
9. Bulic D, Bennett M, Georgousopoulou EN, Shehabi Y, Pham T, Looi JC, van Haren FM (2020) Cognitive and psychosocial outcomes of mechanically ventilated intensive care patients with and without delirium. Ann Intensive Care 10:1–10 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. *Çevik K, Namik E (2018) Effect of auditory stimulation on the level of consciousness in comatose patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosci Nurs 50(6):375–380 [PubMed]
11. *Chuaykarn U, Jitpanya C (2017) Effects of two sensory stimulation models on recovery in adults with severe traumatic brain injury. Int J Med Res Health Sci 6:69–74
12. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.New Jersey. Retrieved from:http://books.google.com.tr/.Accessed 3 May 2024
13. Dönmez YC, Korkmaz FD, Geçit S (2020) Perception of environmental stressors in the intensive care unit by patients. Turk Clin J Nurs Sci 12(2):190–197 [Google Scholar]
14. Erbay Ö, Karadakovan A (2021) A subject ignored in dementia patients: sunset syndrome and nursing approaches. J Ege Univ Fac Nurs 37(1):79–86 [Google Scholar]
15. Erwin EJ, Bacon JK, Lalvani P (2023) It’s about time! Advancing justice through joyful inquiry with young children. Top Early Child Spec Educ 43(1):71–82 [Google Scholar]
16. *Gorji MAH, Araghiyansc F, Jafari H et al (2014) Effect of auditory stimulation on traumatic coma duration in intensive care unit of Medical Sciences University of Mazandarn. Iran Saudi J Anaesth 8(1):69 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Grissom RJ, Kim JJ (2005) Effect sizes for research: a broad practical approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-04135-000
18. Hatipoğlu H (2021) Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eskişehir Turk World Appl Res Cent Inform J 2(1):7–10 [Google Scholar]
19. * Henricson M, Ersson A, M€a€att€a S et al (2008 ) The outcome of tactile touch on stress parameters in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract 4(4):244–254 [PubMed]
20. Hwang E, Shin S (2015) The effects of aromatherapy on sleep improvement: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Altern Complement Med 21(2):61–68 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. *Karaman Özlü Z, Özer N (2017) The effect of enhancing environmental factors on the quality of patients’ sleep in a cardiac surgical intensive care unit. Biol Rhythm Res 48(1):85–98. 10.1080/09291016.2016.1232462
22. *Khojeh A, Sajjadi M, Ajam H (2018) The effect of the organized auditory stimulation with a familiar voice on pain intensity and physiological indices of comatose patients admitted to the intensive care unit. J Res Med Dent Sci 6(3):69–77. 10.5455/jrmds.2018631
23. Kiliç G, Polat Ü (2021) A controversial practice in intensive care: physical restraint. J Turk Nurses Assoc 2(1):66–76 [Google Scholar]
24. *Lee SY, Kang J (2020) Effect of virtual reality meditation on sleep quality of intensive care unit patients: a randomised controlled trial. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 59:102849 [PubMed]
25. Li J, Cheng Q, Liu FK et al (2020) Sensory stimulation to improve arousal in comatose patients after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the literature. Neurol Sci 41:2367–2376 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Liang S, Chau JPC, Lo SHS et al (2021) Effects of nonpharmacological delirium-prevention interventions on critically ill patients’ clinical, psychological, and family outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Crit Care 34(4):378–387 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. *Megha SH, Nayeem Z (2013) Effect of frequency of multimodal coma stimulation on the consciousness levels of traumatic brain injury comatose patients. Brain Inj 27(5):570–577. 10.3109/02699052.2013.767937 [PubMed]
28. *Moeini M, Khadibi M, Bekhradi R et al (2010) Effect of aromatherapy on the quality of sleep in ischemic heart disease patients hospitalized in intensive care units of heart hospitals of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 15(4):234 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) PRISMA Group, 2009. Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther 89:873–880 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. *Naseri-Salahshour V, Varaei S, Sajadi M et al (2018) The effect of religious intervention on the level of consciousness of comatose patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Integr Med 21:53–57
31. Özdemir E, Kavaklı Ö (2022) Nursing care of critical patient infected with new type coronavirus (Sars-Cov-2) according to activities of daily living model.J Intens Care Nurs26(2):65–73
32. *Öz F, Cerit B (2023) The effect of eye patch and ear plug application on sleep quality in patients hospitalised in coronary intensive care unit. Hacet Univ J Nurs Fac 10(2):119–126
33. *Özlü ZK, Bilican P (2017) Effects of aromatherapy massage on the sleep quality and physiological parameters of patients in a surgical intensive care unit. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 14(3):83–88 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. *Parveen Y, Dhandapani M, Dhandapani S, Gupta SK (2015)A randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of auditory stimulation on selected parameters of comatose patients with traumatic brain injury. Indian J Neurotraum 12(02):128–134
35. *Rooin R, Navidian A, Sarani H et al (2023)Comparing the effect of foot reflexology massage and familiar sensory stimulation on the level of consciousness of trauma patients admitted to intensive care units: a clinical trial study. Med Surg Nurs J 12(1):e139149. 10.5812/msnj-139149
36. Sahawneh F, Boss L (2021) Non-pharmacologic interventions for the prevention of delirium in the intensive care unit: an integrative review. Nurs Crit Care 26(3):166–175 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. *Salmani F, Mohammadi E, Rezvani M, Kazemnezhad A (2017) The effects of family-centered affective stimulation on brain-injured comatose patients’ level of consciousness: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 74:44–52 [PubMed]
38. *Şanlıtürk D, Kaplan V, Dörtkardeş N (2023) Preventive effect of cognitive stimulation and sleep hygiene on delirium in COVID-19 intensive care patients. J Turki Sleep Med 10(3):206–215
39. *Sargolzaei K, Shaghaee Fallah M, Aghebati N et al (2017) Effect of a structured sensory stimulation program on the sensory function of patients with stroke-induced disorder of consciousness. Evid Based Care 7(2):7–16
40. Shih CY, Gordon CJ, Chen TJ et al (2022) Kritik hasta kişilerde uyku kalitesi üzerine farmakolojik olmayan müdahalelerin karşılaştırmalı etkinliği: Sistematik bir inceleme ve ağ meta-analizi. Uluslararası Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi 130:104220
41. *Şirin Gök M (2015)The effect of different auditory stimuli on the life findings, oxygen saturation and coma level of intensive care patients (doctoral dissertation). Atatürk University/ Institute of Health Sciences, Erzurum, pp 25–45
42. Testoni, I., Iacona, E., Palazzo, L., Barzizza, B., Baldrati, B., Mazzon, D., ... & Leo, D. D. (2021). Death notification in Italian critical care unites and emergency services. A qualitative study with physicians, nurses and relatives. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(24), 13338 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E,Campbell J, Hopp L (2020) Chapter 3: systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (eds) JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. 10.46658/JBIMES-20-04
44. Turna Ö, Gürsoy A (2021) The use of physical restraint in intensive care units: reasons and results. Hacet Univ J Nurs Fac 8(2):127–133 [Google Scholar]
45. Ulus M, Durmaz Eder A (2022) Prevention of delirium in intensive care patients after open heart surgery. J Cardiovasc Nurs 13(30):43–49 [Google Scholar]
46. *Urbenjaphol P, Jitpanya C, Khaoropthum S (2009) Effects of the sensory stimulation program on recovery in unconscious patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs 41(3):E10–E16
47. *Uysal N, Vaizoğlu D (2023) The effect of video call with family members on physiological parameters of critically ill patients in intensive care unit: a quasi-experimental study. Indian J Crit Care Med 27(10):732–736 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Yücel H (2023) Yoğun Bakımda Ergoterapi. Turk J Intens Care 21(2):59–67
49. Zuo J, Tao Y, Liu M, Feng L, Yang Y, Liao L (2021) The effect of family-centered sensory and affective stimulation on comatose patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 115 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Irish Journal of Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Springer
 On Amazon Prime)